As a long time reader of comp.risks, and having a professional interest in security (as a sysadmin), I'll take this opportunity to say that anyone who is promoting online voting as a replacement for paper ballots is (in my opinion) one or more of a)Hopelessly naive, b)Frighteningly optimistic, c)Woefully ignorant of the problems of authentication combined with anonymity, d)Ignoring the problems of coercion, or (worst of all) e) Willing to accept vote tampering. I do not seriously think that the Electoral Commissioner would be willing to accept vote tampering, but every electronic or online system has been demonstrated to be vulnerable to it. Worse, such attacks can occur at any point, be it in corrupt coding, interference with the ballots, or by injecting forged ballots. All of these have be proven to be possible in every practical and theoretical system proposed to date. This is ignoring the problem of d) - if the voting is not occurring in a public place, how do you prove that t...
It just confirms the tech is not mature enough for a manned mission, just imagine that they were resupply ships
ReplyDeleteSo what is the USA hiding on the surface of Mars that they can't allow any other countries probe to land?
ReplyDeleteOr alternatively what treaties did the USA make with John Carter's descendants to allow only their probes to land?
:)
Oooh! I like the second one!
ReplyDeleteThe Barsoom brainstorm.
ReplyDelete