OF course it's shitty but how is that different from any person being ripped off it doesn't just happen to females all of science history is filled with someone ripping off someone else taking the credit for someone else's work. I bet it's happening to someone right now a techie or a junior person somewhere discovers something and the boss or a colleague takes the credit. The challenge for modern science now is credit people where credit is due eliminate the fraudsters and credit the people who did the work. If the historical record is wrong change it. you won't get rid of centuries of discrimination unless the changes are made.
even these days you are probably right. All I'm saying If the historical record is proven to be factually wrong it should be changed to give credit where credit is due.
I've had people take credit or pretend they have done my work just to get a sale and not all of them were men. it's very annoying.
OK, so here in OZ we have instituted a regular get-together of state and federal heads to discuss issues around The 19, and how to deal with it. Officially it is called The National Cabinet. Enter the ABC Coronavirus Live Blog - an informal stream run by the ABC Newsroom to allow readers to ask questions and get clarifications about the various restrictions, lockdowns, vaccine rollouts, and so on. It has developed into quite the tight-knit community, with their own in-jokes (Hi Barbara - how's the pool-boy doing?) and their own slang. One of the central pieces of which is the nick-name for the National Cabinet - forever known as the NashyCab. Which resulted in extensive speculation about just what that was. Over the past couple of weeks, we have entered Nashi season here, and my chance to strike has arrived. I now present, for the first time in public, The NashiCab. The Ingredients For the Nut Crumble 200g Almonds (or Macadamias) 60g Butter 50g Brown Sugar 50g Raw Sugar For the Cr...
These days I do most of my blog-type posting on aus.social, a Mastodon instance. Sometimes though the limited formatting makes that a poor choice. This is one such case. Today I want to take you through the post-processing steps I go through to create a final astrophotographic artwork. And these are artworks, not scientific records. I could use the same data to perform astrometric observations, but I don't. I like to create beautiful images. Knowing the things I am creating pictures of is part of creating that beauty, and that does require some scientific knowledge, but it is only a means to an end. So, let's start with what comes out of my telescope. I use either a DwarfII or Dwarf3 smart telescope for my imaging, and what comes out of that is already pre-processed in a variety of ways. The telescope does its own stacking, and has a built-in link to a cloud post processor. So what I get is two images - one denoised and with basic image optimisations performed, and ano...
OF course it's shitty but how is that different from any person being ripped off it doesn't just happen to females all of science history is filled with someone ripping off someone else taking the credit for someone else's work.
ReplyDeleteI bet it's happening to someone right now a techie or a junior person somewhere discovers something and the boss or a colleague takes the credit.
The challenge for modern science now is credit people where credit is due
eliminate the fraudsters and credit the people who did the work.
If the historical record is wrong change it.
you won't get rid of centuries of discrimination unless the changes are made.
But it happens more to women.
ReplyDeleteeven these days you are probably right.
ReplyDeleteAll I'm saying If the historical record is proven to be factually wrong it should be changed to give credit where credit is due.
I've had people take credit or pretend they have done my work just to get a sale and not all of them were men. it's very annoying.