Second of a few retrospective looks at Swancons past. Swancon38 - 2013.

Second of a few retrospective looks at Swancons past. Swancon38 - 2013.














Comments

  1. PRK25 February 2015 at 21:04

    Would a Memories category be more useful than Discussion for the retrospectives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rob Masters26 February 2015 at 07:04

    Sounds like a good idea, PRK !

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Churchill Rd Raclette - Delendale Creamery

Image
Churchill Rd Raclette - Delendale Creamery For this one I have one clear instruction before we begin. Pick up the cheese, step away from the cheese-board, and get thee to the kitchen. This is a cheese that needs - possibly even demands - some heat. Now I know the kitchen is a bit of a foreign place for the cheese-lover - I mean what use is there of fry-pans or cook-pots? Bear with me though, this journey is worth it. Before we begin, I'm going to take you on a small flight of fancy. Imagine, if you will, that an honest English Cheddar decided to take a holiday on the Continent, and found itself in Switzerland. Maybe seeking some great waterfall to encounter a perilous foe, it instead meets a sweet and charming Emmental. Romance blossoms, the Cheddar settles - foe forgotten, and the two have a child. Roll forward a dozen years and a few more, and this is Raclette. The bitter-edged teenager child - probably miffed that Cheddar failed to find and defeat that foe. Raclette is a cheese...
Read more

As a long time reader of comp.risks, and having a professional interest in security (as a sysadmin), I'll take this...

As a long time reader of comp.risks, and having a professional interest in security (as a sysadmin), I'll take this opportunity to say that anyone who is promoting online voting as a replacement for paper ballots is (in my opinion) one or more of a)Hopelessly naive, b)Frighteningly optimistic, c)Woefully ignorant of the problems of authentication combined with anonymity, d)Ignoring the problems of coercion, or (worst of all) e) Willing to accept vote tampering. I do not seriously think that the Electoral Commissioner would be willing to accept vote tampering, but every electronic or online system has been demonstrated to be vulnerable to it. Worse, such attacks can occur at any point, be it in corrupt coding, interference with the ballots, or by injecting forged ballots. All of these have be proven to be possible in every practical and theoretical system proposed to date.  This is ignoring the problem of d) - if the voting is not occurring in a public place, how do you prove that t...
Read more