(End credits, Excel Saga) Yes, today I have a very sad tale to share in my cyanography experiments. You remember last time, I shared this: Well, I have experimented further with inkjet photo paper, and made some very unpleasant discoveries along the way. The first is the streaking - without using a non-contact application method, I am not going to avoid it. The gel surface is just too fragile. So if I want to persist with this, it will be out with the air-brush. I somehow doubt I am going to find spray-cans of cyanotype sensitiser, after all. The second is in washing. Because there is no cellulose for the Prussian Blue to bond with, the washing inevitably destroys the image, meaning that you cannot preserve the image long-term. This also means that you end up including the un-exposed chemicals in the scan, which adds considerable grain and loss of contrast - especially in the high-tones of the inverted image. This second issue is essentially insoluble, which is a pity, as it would h
I'm staying in.
ReplyDeleteFor me it's not an issue, but everyone needs to makeup their own mind.
My info would already be out there in various medical centres, radio-logical /audiological databases and health funds. I bet they wouldn't be very secure either.
I can't remember when I saw the same one doctor twice in a row and all my info is stored on a common Db in the medical centre anyway. How secure is it there?
The police could get a court order now if they had cause.
I'd rather have the info available especially if i'm unconscious out of state in an ed department and can't tell people i'm allergic to morphine or that i'm diabetic.