As a long time reader of comp.risks, and having a professional interest in security (as a sysadmin), I'll take this opportunity to say that anyone who is promoting online voting as a replacement for paper ballots is (in my opinion) one or more of a)Hopelessly naive, b)Frighteningly optimistic, c)Woefully ignorant of the problems of authentication combined with anonymity, d)Ignoring the problems of coercion, or (worst of all) e) Willing to accept vote tampering. I do not seriously think that the Electoral Commissioner would be willing to accept vote tampering, but every electronic or online system has been demonstrated to be vulnerable to it. Worse, such attacks can occur at any point, be it in corrupt coding, interference with the ballots, or by injecting forged ballots. All of these have be proven to be possible in every practical and theoretical system proposed to date. This is ignoring the problem of d) - if the voting is not occurring in a public place, how do you prove that t...
This is a disaster for The Greens in Canning by election. with Abbot still in the chair we could expect quite a few liberal conservatives to vote green. That will not be as likely under Turnbull..
ReplyDeleteVery true, Andrew Muhling.
ReplyDeleteAndrew Muhling Think of it as taking one for the good of all Australians. Okay, maybe that isn't much of a consolation.
ReplyDeleteAndrew Muhling maybe that's why they did it? :)
ReplyDeletebek yeah. A sort of double bluff.
ReplyDeleteHastie seems to be an Abbot man. He was involved in setting up Border Farce. Maybe Turnbull wasn't sure of his numbers.
ReplyDelete