Title


Comments

  1. Paul Simmons11 September 2013 at 16:27

    Really nice panorama, shame about the stitch line  in the middle of the foreground (in the water)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rob Masters11 September 2013 at 16:47

    Damn. I missed that. Ripples are a pain for automated stitching software.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Well, we had perfect conditions here in Perth on Wednesday night for a bit of moon watching.

Image
Well, we had perfect conditions here in Perth on Wednesday night for a bit of moon watching. With thanks to Alicia Smith for helping out with setup, suggestions, and being an all-round good sport. February 2018 Copy Codes WPP2018 - Week 06 - Circle or Circles Françoise Dhulesia, Angela Migliore, Byron Sheldrick, Dave Hollis, Carmen Mandich, madhura ravishankar, Constantinos Catsoulis, Alicia Smith, Rob Masters, Francesco Scaglioni, Mary Wardell, Navin Upendran #WPP2018 #WPP2018-Wk-06-CircleorCircles
Read more

They are getting ready to blow up part of the ISS!

Image
They are getting ready to blow up part of the ISS! And by "blow up", I mean "inflate". 😎 And for folks here in sandgroper country, that's 5:30PM local. Originally shared by NASA Set your alarms! Get live updates from Mission Control as the 1st human-rated expandable habitat is deployed to full size. Tune in to NASA Television tomorrow starting at 5:30 a.m. EDT: http://nasa.tumblr.com/post/144865039409/more-spacein-space
Read more

This Experiment Failed

Image
(End credits, Excel Saga) Yes, today I have a very sad tale to share in my cyanography experiments. You remember last time, I shared this: Well, I have experimented further with inkjet photo paper, and made some very unpleasant discoveries along the way. The first is the streaking - without using a non-contact application method, I am not going to avoid it. The gel surface is just too fragile. So if I want to persist with this, it will be out with the air-brush. I somehow doubt I am going to find spray-cans of cyanotype sensitiser, after all.  The second is in washing. Because there is no cellulose for the Prussian Blue to bond with, the washing inevitably destroys the image, meaning that you cannot preserve the image long-term. This also means that you end up including the un-exposed chemicals in the scan, which adds considerable grain and loss of contrast - especially in the high-tones of the inverted image.  This second issue is essentially insoluble, which is a pity, as it would h
Read more